Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminology and Criminal Justice
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frisher, M.
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Drug use desistance

Martin Frisher

Helen Beckett

Keele University, UK

Drug dependence is generally thought to involve a loss or reduction of individual autonomy. Yet of the 11 million people in the UK (27 per cent of the population aged 16–74) who have ever used illicit drugs at some point in their life, probably no more than 300,000 (1%) are drug dependent. Many commentators find the apparently self-destructive behaviour of problematic drug users difficult to explain. According to rational theory, choices are made with respect to a long timeframe so as to maximize overall utility. Under maximization, individuals cannot gradually slide towards a very high level of drug use at the expense of other activities as this would reduce their overall utility. The key to understanding drug dependence is that it involves ‘matching’ different behavioural combinations at any given point in time that do not take account of long-term consequences. There is growing evidence that drug users are much more likely to match compared to non-drug users and that they have difficulty in learning to maximize. We argue that current practice within the UK criminal justice system is implicitly based on the idea that relearning the value of alternative behaviours can lead to drug use desistance.

Key Words: addiction • desistance • learning • offending • rationality

References

  • Abraham, M.D., L. Hendrien and P. Cohen (1998) Licit and Illicit Drug Use in the Netherlands 1997. Amsterdam: CEDRO/Mets en Schilt .
  • American Psychiatric Association (1994) DSM-IV, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association .
  • Anonymous (no date a) Does Cannabis Use Lead to Hard Drugs? http://www.ukcia.org/culture/effects/gateway01.php (accessed 10 October 2005).
  • Anonymous (no date b) The First Hit. http://www.erowid.org/experiences/exp.php?ID=7688 (accessed 10 October 2005).
  • Appel, P.W., R. Smith, J.B. Schmeidler and J. Randell (2000) ‘Impact of a Vocational Counselor on Employment-Related Outcomes among Methadone Patients’ , Evaluation and Programme Planning 23(4): 437–448 .[CrossRef]
  • Beardsley, S.D. and J.J. McDowell (1992) ‘Application of Herrnstein’s Hyperbola to Time Allocation of Naturalistic Human Behavior Maintained by Naturalistic Social Reinforcement’ , Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 57: 177–185 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Beckett, H., J. Heap, I. Crome et al. (2003) Understanding Problem Drug Use among Young People Accessing Drug Services: A Multivariate Approach Using Statistical Modelling Techniques. London: Home Office (www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr1504.pdf).
  • Burroughs, W. (1977 [1953]) Junkie: Confessions of an Unredeemed Drug Addict Junky. New York: Viking/Penguin .
  • Calafat, A., K. Bohrn and M. Juan (1999) Night Life in Europe and Recreative Drug Use. Valencia: European Commission .
  • Cheung, Y.W. and N.W.T. Cheung (2003) ‘Social Capital and Risk Level of Posttreatment Drug Use: Implications for Harm Reduction among Male Treated Addicts in Hong Kong’ , Addiction Research and Theory 11(3): 145–162 .[CrossRef]
  • Conklin, C. and S. Tiffany (2002) ‘Applying Extinction Research and Theory to Cue Exposure Addiction Treatments’ , Addiction 97(2): 155–167 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Crowell, S. (no date) Existentialism. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/existentialism/%232.1 (accessed 10 October 2005).
  • Davies, J. (1997) The Myth of Addiction(2nd edn). Switzerland: Harwood Academic .
  • Davies, J.B. and R. Baker (1987) ‘The Impact of Self-Presentation and Interviewer Bias Effects on Self-Reported Heroin Use’ , British Journal of Addiction 82(8): 907–912 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Einstadter, W. and S. Henry (1995) Criminological Theory: An Analysis of Its Underlying Assumptions. Texas: Harcourt Brace & Company .
  • Eiser, J.R. (1980) Cognitive Social Psychology. London: McGraw Hill .
  • Eley, S., K. Gallop, G. McIvor, K. Morgan and R. Yates (2002) Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Evaluation of the Scottish Pilots. Stirling: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit .
  • Farrell, M., S. Howes, C. Taylor, G. Lewis, R. Jenkins, P. Bebbington et al. (2003) ‘Substance Misuse and Psychiatric Comorbidity: An Overview of the OPCS National Psychiatric Morbidity Survey’ , International Review of Psychiatry 15(1–2): 43–49 .
  • Gorman, D.M. and H.R. White (1995) ‘You Can Choose Your Friends, But Do They Choose Your Crime? Implications of Differential Association Theories for Crime Prevention Policy’, in H. Barlow (ed.) Crime and Public Policy: Putting Theory to Work, pp. 131–155. Crime and Society Series. Colorado: Westview Press .
  • Green, L., E.B. Fisher, S. Perlow and L. Sherman (1981) ‘Preference Reversal and Self Control: Choice as a Function of Reward Amount and Delay’ , Behaviour Analysis Letters 1: 43–51 .
  • Hagan, J. and B. McCarthy (1997) Mean Streets: Youth Crime and Homelessness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
  • Hammersley, R. and M. Reid (2002) ‘Why the Pervasive Addiction Myth Is Still Believed’ , Addiction Research and Theory 10(1): 7–30 .
  • Harrison, L.D. (2001) ‘The Revolving Prison Door for Drug Involved Offenders: Challenges and Opportunities’ , Crime and Delinquency 47(3): 462–484 .
  • Harrison, R. (1983) Bentham. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul .
  • Haynes, P. and G. Ayliffe (1991) ‘Locus of Control of Behaviour: Is High Externality Associated with Substance Misuse’ , British Journal of Addiction 86(9): 1111–1117 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Heider, F. and M. Simmel (1944) ‘An Experimental Study of Apparent Behaviour’ , American Journal of Psychology 57: 243–249 .[CrossRef]
  • Herrnstein, R.J. (1974) ‘Formal Properties of the Matching Law’ , Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 21: 159–164 .[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Herrnstein, R.J. (2002) The Matching Law: Papers in Psychology and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
  • Heyman, G.M. (1996) ‘Resolving the Contradictions of Addiction’ , Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19(4): 561–610 .
  • Hodgson, R. (1989) ‘Resisting Temptation’ , British Journal of Addiction 84(3): 215–257 .
  • Home Office (1999) Drug Treatment and Testing Order: Background and Issues for Consultation. Home Office Circular 59/1999. London: HMSO .
  • Home Office (2000) The Drug Treatment and Testing Order. Home Office Circular 38/2000. London: HMSO .
  • Home Office (2002) Updated Drug Strategy 2002. London: Home Office .
  • Home Office (2003) ‘Press Release: Drug Treatment and Testing Orders Cut’, 25 September. Available at www.drugs.gov.uk/News/PressReleases/1064570561 (accessed 30 October 2003).
  • Johnson, R.A., D.R. Gerstein, R. Ghadialy, W. Choy and J. Gfroerer (1996) Trends in the Incidence of Drug Use in the United States, 1919–1992. Rockville: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Office of Applied Studies .
  • Kaufmann, W. (1981) Freud, Adler, and Jung (Discovering the Mind, Volume 3). London: McGraw Hill .
  • Kothari, G., J. Marsden and J. Strang (2002) ‘Opportunities and Obstacles for Effective Treatment of Drug Misusers in the Criminal Justice System of England and Wales’ , British Journal of Criminology 42(2): 412–432 .[Abstract]
  • Leavitt, F. (1985) Drugs and Behaviour, 3rd edn. California: Sage Publications .
  • Lilly, J.R., F.T. Cullen and R.A. Ball (2002) Criminological Theory: Context and Consequences, 3rd edn. London: Sage Publications .
  • Lynskey, M.T., A.C. Heath, K.K. Bucholz et al. (2003) ‘Escalation of Drug Use in Early-Onset Cannabis Users vs Co-Twin Controls’ , Journal of the American Medical Association 289(4): 427–433 .[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • McBride, W.J., J.M. Murphy and S. Ikemoto (1999) ‘Localization of Brain Reinforcement Mechanisms: Intracranial Self-Administration and Intracranial Place-Conditioning Studies’ , Behavioural Brain Research 101(2): 129–152 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Macleod, J., R. Oakes and A. Copello (2004) ‘Psychological and Social Sequelae of Cannabis and Other Illicit Drug Use by Young People: A Systematic Review of Longitudinal, General Population Studies’ , Lancet 363(9421): 1579–1588 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Michotte, A. (1962) The Perception of Causality. Andover, MA: Methuen .
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (1991) National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Maryland: National Institute on Drug Abuse .
  • Pearson, G. (1999) ‘Drugs at the End of the Century’ , British Journal of Criminology 39(4): 477–487 .[Free Full Text]
  • Peele, S. (1985) The Meaning of Addiction. Lexington: Lexington Books .
  • Pudney, D. (2002) The Road to Ruin? Sequences of Initiation into Drug Use and Offending by Young People in Britain. Home Office Research Study No. 253. London: Home Office .
  • Ramsay, M., P. Baker, C. Goulden, C. Sharp and A. Sondhi (2001) Drug Misuse Declared in 2000: Results from the British Crime Survey. Home Office Research Study No. 224. London: Home Office .
  • Sampson, R.J. and J.H. Laub (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Harvard: Harvard University Press .
  • Sartre, J.P. (1958 [1943]) Being and Nothingness: A Phenomenological Essay on Ontology, trans. H.E. Barnes (1958). London: Methuen & Co .
  • Sartre, J.P. (1947) The Age of Reason(L’ Age de Raison), 1st English edn. New York: Alfred A. Knopf .
  • Scott, C.K., M.A. Foss and M.L. Dennis (2003) ‘Factors Influencing Initial and Longer-Term Responses to Substance Abuse Treatment: A Path Analysis’ , Evaluation and Programme Planning 26: 287–295 .[CrossRef]
  • Skinner, B.F. (1953) Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan .
  • Smith, J. (1983) ‘Supervised Antabuse Therapy’ , Probation Journal 30(4): 130–132 .[Abstract]
  • Sutherland, E.H. (1955) Principles of Criminology, revised D.R. Cressey. Chicago, IL: Lippincott .
  • Tunney, R. and D. Shanks (2002) ‘A Re-examination of Melioration and Rational Choice’ , Journal of Behavioural Decision Making 15: 291–311 .[CrossRef]
  • Turnbull, P., T. McSweeney, R. Webster, M. Edmunds and M. Hough (2000) Drug Treatment and Testing Orders: Final Evaluation Report. Home Office Research Study No. 212. London: Home Office .
  • Volkow, N.D., G.J. Wang, M.W. Fischman, R.W. Foltin, J.S. Fowler, N.N. Abumrad et al. (1997) ‘Relationship between Subjective Effects of Cocaine and Dopamine Transporter Occupancy’ , Nature 386(24 April): 827–830 .[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • World Health Organization (WHO) (1992) ICD-10: The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. London: Gaskell . http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/terminology/ICD10ResearchDiagnosis.pdf (accessed 10 October 2005).

Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 6, No. 1, 127-145 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1748895806060670
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
T. Seddon
Coerced drug treatment in the criminal justice system: Conceptual, ethical and criminological issues
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, August 1, 2007; 7(3): 269 - 286.
[Abstract] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frisher, M.
Right arrow Articles by Beckett, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?