This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lewis, S. Articles by Vennard, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

What works in resettlement? Findings from seven Pathfinders for short-term prisoners in England and Wales

University of Leeds, UK

Mike Maguire

Cardiff University, UK; Glamorgan University, UK

Peter Raynor

Maurice Vanstone

University of Swansea, UK

Julie Vennard

Bristol University, UK

This article presents findings from the evaluation of Phase One of the resettlement ‘Pathfinder’, which was funded under the Home Office Crime Reduction Programme. Seven projects (four probation-led and three run by voluntary agencies) targeted the resettlement needs and/or offending behaviour of adults sentenced to prison for under 12 months, who are currently not subject to post-release supervision. All participants received help with welfare needs, and some attended a short cognitive motivational programme. The results suggest that such interventions can significantly reduce the problems faced by this frequently neglected group, as well as having a positive effect on their attitudes to crime. There was also some evidence of reductions in reconviction, especially among those who maintained contact with mentors after release. The findings have implications for the Government's resettlement agenda, as set out in the Reducing Re-offending National Action Plan, as well as for NOMS policy and practice. The shelving of plans for the introduction of ‘Custody Plus’, it is argued, creates a risk that potentially effective ‘through the gate’ work with short-termers will not come to fruition.

Key Words: motivational work • programmes • reducing re-offending • resettlement • short-term prisoners • NOMS

Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 7, No. 1, 33-53 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/1748895807072475


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. R. Hollin Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomization glister? JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 89 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]