Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminology and Criminal Justice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Birkbeck, C.
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Santiago, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The character of penal control in Latin America

Sentence remissions in a Venezuelan prison

Christopher Birkbeck

Neelie Pérez-Santiago

University of Salford, UK and Universidad Central de Venezuela, Venezuela

While imprisonment is often referred to in Englis-speaking countries as ‘doing time’, in Venezuela this phrase is never used; people speak of ‘discharging the sentence’. This linguistic difference is a useful starting point for a reflection on cultural differences in the character of penal control. In this article, we examine the administration of sentence remissions in a Venezuelan prison during the six years following the enactment of the Sentence Remission Law (1993). Contrary to the active role envisioned by that law, penal bureaucracy assumed a passive role, converting remissions into a claims system for prisoners. Such claims were linked inefficiently to opportunities for early or full release, leading some offenders to spend more time than necessary in prison. Nonstandardized procedures for factoring remissions into the proportion of time served, together with frequent errors in date computation, also injected a random element into the flow of time. Time served in prison was therefore jointly determined by the offender's abilities as a claimant and by the random operation and errors of the penal timekeeping system. Remissions set the stage for a game of chance that is antithetical to the regularity, predictability and immutability that supposedly characterize penal sanctions.

Key Words: prison • remissions • sentences • time • Venezuela

Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 6, No. 3, 289-308 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1748895806065531


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?