This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Annison, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Style over substance?

A review of the evidence base for the use of learning styles in probation

University of Plymouth, UK

The implementation of the What Works agenda within probation has brought about the development and delivery of a suite of accredited programmes in relation to work with offenders. The accreditation criteria emphasize the evidence-based nature of these interventions and outline a number of key principles. An integral tenet of this approach has been ‘relevance to offenders’ learning style’. While most of the other aspects have been explored in research studies and publications, this element has tended to become a ‘given’ and while mentioned, has not been subjected to a similar level of critique. The recent publication of an evaluation of learning styles by the Learning and Skills Research Centre has provided an important overview and appraisal of this area, which is relevant to probation practice. This article draws together these various strands by outlining the changing situation in probation, reviewing the findings concerning learning styles and then developing an analysis of the wider implications for probation policy and practice.

Key Words: accredited programmes • evidence-based practice • learning styles • probation • What Works

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?