Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Access Criminology and Criminal Justice journals now

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mair, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Electronic monitoring in England and Wales

Evidence-based or not?

George Mair

Liverpool John Moores University, UK

The importance of an evidence-based approach to policy and practice has been a defining characteristic of the Labour administrations since 1997. This article uses the example of electronic monitoring of offenders in England and Wales to assess how far its introduction and development could be said to be evidence-based. While the idea of evidence-based policy or practice may appear appealing, the complex nature of the policy process and the question of what constitutes evidence, render it problematic. The research into electronic monitoring—all of it carried out or commissioned by government—carries consistent messages, but these do not seem to have been heeded by government. As far as the electronic monitoring of offenders is concerned, evidence-based remains at the level of a rhetorical claim.

Key Words: curfew orders • electronic monitoring • evidence-based • policy • practice • research

Criminal Justice, Vol. 5, No. 3, 257-277 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1466802505055836


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Criminal Justice Policy ReviewHome page
D. M. Button, M. DeMichele, and B. K. Payne
Using Electronic Monitoring to Supervise Sex Offenders: Legislative Patterns and Implications for Community Corrections Officers
Criminal Justice Policy Review, December 1, 2009; 20(4): 414 - 436.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
A. Hucklesby
Vehicles of desistance?: The impact of electronically monitored curfew orders
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 51 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Criminal JusticeHome page
J. R. Lilly
Book Review: Electronic Monitoring of Offenders: Key Developments Issues in Community and Criminal Justice--Monograph 5
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 155 - 157.
[PDF]