Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminal Justice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mcara, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mcvie, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The usual suspects?

Street-life, young people and the police

Lesley Mcara

Susan Mcvie

University of Edinburgh, UK

This article explores children's experience of policing. Drawing on findings from the Edinburgh Study of Youth Transitions and Crime, it argues that the police may be unfairly targeting certain categories of young people. Evidence is presented on the ways in which police working rules (relating to previous ‘form’ and suspiciousness) serve to construct a population of permanent suspects among children. While street-life places youngsters at greater risk of adversarial contact, ‘availability’ by itself, cannot explain this aspect of policing practice. The police appear to make distinctions about the respectable and unrespectable, children who can be accorded leniency and those who cannot; distinctions which are based as much on socio-economic status as serious and persistent offending. The article concludes that the police act less as legal subjects and more as class subjects in their interactions with young people and that the policing of children may serve to sustain and reproduce the very problems which the institution ostensibly attempts to contain or eradicate.

Key Words: children • police • social class • street-life • youth offending

Criminal Justice, Vol. 5, No. 1, 5-36 (2005)
DOI: 10.1177/1466802505050977
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J CriminolHome page
A. Crawford
Governing Through Anti-social Behaviour: Regulatory Challenges to Criminal Justice
Br. J. Criminol., November 1, 2009; 49(6): 810 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Youth JusticeHome page
A. Crawford
Criminalizing Sociability through Anti-social Behaviour Legislation: Dispersal Powers, Young People and the Police
Youth Justice, April 1, 2009; 9(1): 5 - 26.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Criminal JusticeHome page
P. Reuter and A. Stevens
Assessing UK drug policy from a crime control perspective
JCriminology and Criminal Justice, November 1, 2008; 8(4): 461 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Theoretical CriminologyHome page
C. Webster
Marginalized white ethnicity, race and crime
Theoretical Criminology, August 1, 2008; 12(3): 293 - 312.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 European Journal of CriminologyHome page
L. McAra and S. McVie
Youth Justice?: The Impact of System Contact on Patterns of Desistance from Offending
European Journal of Criminology, July 1, 2007; 4(3): 315 - 345.
[Abstract] [PDF]