This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Raynor, P. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Probation Service ‘Pathfinders’

Finding the path and losing the way?

University of Wales, Swansea, UK

Part of the programme of research funded under the Crime Reduction Programme was a group of evaluative studies of innovative probation service projects known as ‘Pathfinders’. These projects were developed as part of the ‘What Works’ initiative which had been pursued by the Probation Service since the mid-1990s, and need to be understood in that context as well as in the context of the Crime Reduction Programme. ‘What Works’ was an attempt to achieve a rapid step-change in the effectiveness of probation work in England and Wales through systematic application of international research on effective methods for the rehabilitation of offenders. The studies carried out with the Crime Reduction Programme support represented a resurgence of research interest in the effective supervision of offenders, after a period of relative neglect. However, the results of the studies have been less positive than was hoped and expected by Probation Service leaders. This article explores some of the arguments which are currently being put forward to account for this, and considers in particular the problems of implementation and time-scale which afflicted the projects, the narrow model of evaluation which informed the research strategy, and the limited role of evidence in a criminal justice context dominated by politically driven initiatives.

Key Words: evaluation • evidence-based practice • pathfinders • probation

Criminal Justice, Vol. 4, No. 3, 309-325 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1466802504048468


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Kemshall Risks, Rights and Justice: Understanding and Responding to Youth Risk Youth Justice, April 1, 2008; 8(1): 21 - 37. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Hollin, J. McGuire, J. C. Hounsome, R. M. Hatcher, C. A.L. Bilby, and E. J. Palmer Cognitive Skills Behavior Programs for Offenders in the Community: A Reconviction Analysis Criminal Justice and Behavior, March 1, 2008; 35(3): 269 - 283. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Raynor Community penalties and Home Office research: On the way back to `nothing works'? JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 73 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. R. Hollin Evaluating offending behaviour programmes: Does only randomization glister? JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2008; 8(1): 89 - 106. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. Raynor and H. Miles Evidence-based Probation in a Microstate: The British Channel Island of Jersey European Journal of Criminology, July 1, 2007; 4(3): 299 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Lewis, M. Maguire, P. Raynor, M. Vanstone, and J. Vennard What works in resettlement? Findings from seven Pathfinders for short-term prisoners in England and Wales JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2007; 7(1): 33 - 53. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Robinson and P. Raynor The future of rehabilitation: What role for the probation service? Probation Journal, December 1, 2006; 53(4): 334 - 346. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Annison Style over substance?: A review of the evidence base for the use of learning styles in probation JCriminology and Criminal Justice, May 1, 2006; 6(2): 239 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Maguire and P. Raynor How the resettlement of prisoners promotes desistance from crime: Or does it? JCriminology and Criminal Justice, February 1, 2006; 6(1): 19 - 38. [Abstract] [PDF]