Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Criminology and Criminal Justice
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LIEBLING, A.
Right arrow Articles by ARNOLD, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Transforming the Prison:

Romantic Optimism or Appreciative Realism?

ALISON LIEBLING

Institute of Criminology, Cambridge, UK

CHARLES ELLIOTT

Institute of Criminology, Cambridge, UK

HELEN ARNOLD

Institute of Criminology, Cambridge, UK

This article explores the use of appreciative inquiry [Al] in a number of prisons, with different outcomes. It considers the nature of the Al process, both as a mode of inquiry and a mode of transformation. There are some links, in terms of the underlying principles, between Al and restorative justice and these are explored by the authors. They conclude that Al constitutes a fair and inclusive research approach that generates a rich and faithful account of a prison to emerge. It generates energy among prison staff that can be harnessed in the direction of better practice. But there are dangers when highly motivated prison officers are frustrated by a lack of responsiveness by senior managers in their `wishes for the prison', however understandable the reasons for this. The mechanism at work is a normative process, which seems to engage the research participants in meaningful, constructive and ethically relevant dialogue about their practices and experiences. The special and complex moral environment of the prison makes Al especially relevant.

Key Words: management • methodology • prison • prison officers • restorative justice

Criminology and Criminal Justice, Vol. 1, No. 2, 161-180 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/1466802501001002002


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Research in NursingHome page
B. Carter
'One expertise among many'-- working appreciatively to make miracles instead of finding problems: Using appreciative inquiry as a way of reframing research
Journal of Research in Nursing, January 1, 2006; 11(1): 48 - 63.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Probation JournalHome page
A. Liebling
Suicides in Prison and the Safer Prisons Agenda
Probation Journal, June 1, 2002; 49(2): 140 - 150.
[PDF]